Lent, they claim, serves as a reminder of Christ's humility in sacrificing Himself for us. Okay, but why should that reminder be so shallow as giving up a food or habit between Ash Wednesday and Resurrection Sunday, knowing full well that we'll resume the practice as soon as we leave the church parking lot after Easter services? I can't help wondering if people believe (at least secretly) that their Lenten self-denial in some way commends them to God.
Thinking about Lent reminds me of Paul's words to the Colossian church:
20 If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the world, why, as if you were still alive in the world, do you submit to regulations— 21 “Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch” 22 (referring to things that all perish as they are used)—according to human precepts and teachings? 23 These have indeed an appearance of wisdom in promoting self-made religion and asceticism and severity to the body, but they are of no value in stopping the indulgence of the flesh. ~~Colossians 2:20-23 (ESV)When the Lord called us to die to self as a condition of following Him (Luke 9:23), He meant actual death. And spiritually, Christians must die to the demands of our sin natures (Colossians 3:5-10). The superficial self-denial of Lent comes no where near the demands that following Jesus requires, but rather inflates our egos with the false assurance of self-righteousness.
If a Christian observes Lent with a true attitude of wishing to honor Christ, I will not judge his heart. But I suspect that most evangelicals who are climbing back to Roman Catholic traditions observe Lent almost as a sacrament. That being the case, I have difficulty accepting Lent as something consistent with the faith that our Reformation forefathers suffered and died for. Further, I believe Paul would have opposed it, much as He opposed the ascetic practices that threatened the Colossian church. Let us die to sin, and be ready to die for Christ, rather than indulging in a 40 day fast each year.