But should Bible-believing Christians add psychology to their arsenal of spiritual weapons? Of course, my regular readers already know my answer. But let me offer my basic reason for rejecting the blending of psychology and the Bible.
Most of us, I believe, would consider Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung as the fathers of modern psychology. For that reason, we ought to know something about their spiritual outlooks. Did they hold views that agree with Biblical doctrine? Obviously, a thorough examination of their spiritual convictions lies well beyond the scope of this small blog post, and you'll need to do your own research, but let me prime the pump just a bit.
Freud, in his later life, embraced his Jewish heritage only in response to anti-Semitism. In all other respects, he demonstrated great contempt for religion.
"Religion is an attempt to get control over the sensory world, in which we are placed, by means of the wish-world, which we have developed inside us as a result of biological and psychological necessities. [...] If one attempts to assign to religion its place in man's evolution, it seems not so much to be a lasting acquisition, as a parallel to the neurosis which the civilized individual must pass through on his way from childhood to maturity." –Sigmund Freud, Moses and Monotheism, 1939Jung, on the other hand, had no trouble with spirituality, as his father was a Reformed minister. But he rejected the idea of specific creeds and approached the idea of God from a New Age perspective.
“It is only through the psyche that we can establish that God acts upon us, but we are unable to distinguish whether these actions emanate from God or from the unconscious. We cannot tell whether God and the unconscious are two different entities. Both are border-line concepts for transcendental contents. But empirically it can be established, with a sufficient degree of probability, that there is in the unconscious an archetype of wholeness. Strictly speaking, the God-image does not coincide with the unconscious as such, but with this special content of it, namely the archetype of the Self.”Neither of these men believed the Bible, and therefore they constructed psychological models based on human reasoning. Yet Christian counseling, like all form of Christian ministry, must rely exclusively on God's wisdom, which sets itself apart from human theories and philosophies.
18 For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written,
“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
and the discernment of the discerning I will thwart.”20 Where is the one who is wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? 21 For since, in the wisdom of God, the world did not know God through wisdom, it pleased God through the folly of what we preach to save those who believe. 22 For Jews demand signs and Greeks seek wisdom, 23 but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles, 24 but to those who are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. ~~1 Corinthians 1:18-25 (ESV)
Freud and Jung offer the sort of human wisdom that appeals to unregenerate human nature rather than having its foundation in the Gospel of Jesus Christ. That being the case, psychology has no business mixing with the pure counsel that can come only from God's Word. Please, dear sisters in Christ, don't settle for counseling that adulterates God's pure Word with atheistic and New Age principles. Not when you have access to the wisdom of your Creator.