Saturday, May 17, 2014

The Tender Toes Of Preaching Women

My goodness, have I stepped on tender little toes by saying that women who teach and preach to men dishonor God's Word! One friend even requested that I have the "humility" to preface my remark with the phrase, "In my opinion..." But if I offer merely my opinion on any Scriptural principle, do I not elevate my subjective opinion over the Bible's clear teaching?

Admittedly, an increasing number of evangelicals argue that the Bible's teaching on women in leadership roles lacks clarity, citing Ruth, Miriam, Huldah, Deborah (whose name I bear with much emotional conflict), Esther, the Samaritan woman at the well, Mary Magdalene, Lydia and Priscilla. Put on the defensive, I assume my critics expect me to answer for these ladies. I will consider doing so, though certainly not in one blog post.

In the first place, an average blog post of five or six paragraphs takes me about two hours to type...if I don't include Scripture passages, links, photos or artwork and if I'm properly positioned in my wheelchair. Otherwise, a post could take even longer. Please don't misconstrue this statement as a plea for sympathy; I love blogging, and take great joy in fashioning each post. I merely want readers to understand my physical limitations. Writing about Deborah alone, if I wanted to do her justice, would be a major time investment. Don't fancy, then, that I could cover all these women in one fell swoop. I can't.

More importantly, I'm afraid of crossing a fine line into setting myself up as a teacher. If I knew that only women read my blog, I'd very confidently delve into deep Bible teaching, and particularly about these women! I know I  can explain even Deborah, problematic as she is, by examining Judges 4 and 5 with other Scripture, looking at Hebrew words and consulting commentaries. But in so doing, would I violate the very principle I seek to support? I must carefully consider this point.

Yes, I regard women in leadership as one of the many ways Christians compromise the Word of God with worldly values. In my opinion (and in this sentence, that qualifying phrase is appropriate), the practice can rightly be labeled "baptized feminism." Whether feminism drives it or not, however, it blatantly  defies 1 Timothy 2:8-15, which I quoted in yesterday's post. And, though saying so steps on delicate toes, such defiance can't avoid dishonoring the Word of God.

2 comments:

  1. I think adding "in your opinion" is right because there are so many who don't agree with how you are interpreting scripture here. We are not debating whether or not Jesus rose from the dead, this is not a principle that is a major easy to answer...I think your friend is right to counsel you to say in your opinion, I think we are going to get to Heaven despite some of our failed attempts at interpreting scripture... we might just find out how wrong or right we were. So in the mean time...blog on, but know you have a lot of us who are not avid but find John quite flawed in his interpretation there. Much of his talk was his opinion too...we need to discuss and debate these things but we are all limited in our life experience and education and exposure...I'm enjoying this debate though.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Carry on! Scripture interprets Scripture & everywhere it shows the pattern of women's God-designed role so it's not matter of it being your opinion & it's not a position of leadership over men...but you know that.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for taking the time to read my blog post! I'd love feedback, as long as you attach a name. Disagreement is fine, as long as it is presented respectfully. Please keep comments confined to a maximum of four short paragraphs. Sorry for making to do the Word Verification, but I've been getting too much spam.

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...